Sentry Page Protection

P and D Update for April 8th, 2023

Submitted by Eric Moschopedis on behalf of Planning & Development

We wanted to share a quick update with you about the lease negotiations with the City of Calgary. In our last update in mid-February we shared with you that  Real Estate and Development (REDS) had prepared a report that proposed three scenarios that would then be taken to Council. P & D is aware of the reports content at an extremely high level, however the report itself is confidential as is normal in these types of land transactions. Unfortunately, we can’t tell you what we know, but are confident 2 of the 3 scenarios will work for Sunnyhill. Once the report goes to Council, they will then decide which of the proposed land agreements the City would offer to Sunnyhill. REDS anticipated the report would come forward at the April 25th Council meeting. In our last update we also detailed a process whereby REDS would meet with City Councillors to brief them about the plan and after each meeting REDS would inform us about the meeting so that we could follow up. To date we have not had any further communication from REDS. Lee Prevost from Boundary Design has reached out to Councillor Wong to see if we can get some insight into where the process is at. A meeting is being arranged for as soon as possible. As a note: this kind of silence from REDS has not been unusual in our experience. Ultimately, we are still anticipating REDS will be bringing the proposed scenarios to Council later this month. As soon as we learn more we will let the membership know.

Eric Moschopedis, on behalf of P & D

Planning and Development Land Negotiation Update

Submitted by Eric Moschopedis on behalf of Planning & Development

Dear Neighbours,

We are writing with an update about Planning and Developments on-going negotiations with the City of Calgary regarding our land tenure.

After many months of waiting, the committee, along with Lee Prevost of Boundary Design, met with the Real Estate and Development (REDs) team that has been working with our file over the last couple of years. 

We are happy to report that the REDs team has finalized a report outlining three different land deal scenarios. The report has been vetted by management and Administration and has support to move forward to City Council for a final decision. Of the three scenarios, REDs and Administration will be recommending one in particular to Council, though Council will have the options to choose any one of the three.

Unfortunately, Planning and Development does not know the full details of the report as it is confidential—this is standard practice and we are not being treated differently than any other client the City works with. That said, the committee was told in conversation of the three options at a very high level. Because of the confidentiality of the process, we are not permitted to disclose what we know at this time. But rest assured two of the three options will work for Sunnyhill. Meaning two of the options align with the financial planning (pro forma) we have been working with for years and we believe are in the best interest of the coop. 

 

Next steps: 

Now that REDs and Administration has vetted and approved the report, they will meet with every City Councillor to introduce them to the report and their preferred scenario. These meetings will take place over the next few weeks. REDs will report back to Sunnyhill about the meetings and then Sunnyhill, led by Lee, will follow up with each Councillor to answer any lingering questions or provide more information. 

It is anticipated that the report will go to Council Committee (April 5) and Council Chambers (April 25). These dates are not fully confirmed, but it is possible by end of April Council will have confirmed a land scenario for Sunnyhill.

Once City Council has made its decision, Sunnyhill will then need to act quickly to vote on the terms of the agreement.

In the meantime, Lee will update the financial documents that we submitted as part of our funding applications with with Federation Canadian Municipalities (FCM) and CMHC. This will allow them to begin accurately assessing our funding requests. If all goes well, we will be able to enter into the Detailed Design Phase by summer.

Thank you for your patience as we have worked through this with the City. We are confident that Sunnyhill has a path forward.

 Eric Moschopedis, on behalf of Planning and Development

P and D Update for January 19th, 2023

Submitted by Philip Cox

Since our General Meeting (January 15th) we have learned  more on where we stand with the City on our land tenure options.  Our key contacts there have prepared the report to be presented to Council with their recommendations. Currently the draft is doing the rounds within Real Estate Development Services (REDS) and Affordable Housing before it gets sent onwards to Council.  We do not know what lease and sale scenarios are contained within it.  

Consistent with standard procedure, the report to Council is confidential, but we are assured that the figures and arguments we have provided over what is nearly four years have been worked in. 

Councillor Terry Wong will be sent a copy.  We are free to engage him at any time.  We briefed Terry last Fall when he presided over our celebration of the blacktopping of Sunnyhill Lane; so he knows the file.  His office has also been briefed by Administration on the development of the City’s offer.  

Our contacts tell us that they are queuing up to present to Council in Q1, likely in March.  P and D is scheduled to have our next and likely final meeting with the City on February 9th.  Presumably we will know more by that date, though it is not likely that we will have access to the confidential aspects of the report by then.  

To get background info on the project, see this one-pager  - https://www.dropbox.com/s/llmpllaqyrbftqa/2023-PD%20blurb%20for%20membership-Jan2023.docx?dl=0 or browse the P&D page on our Sunnyhill website. 

Important Membership Information for P & D Financing Plan Options


Submitted by Eric Moschopedis and Bob Bott on behalf of Planning & Development

Planning and Development had an important meeting July 15 with our lead consultant, Lee Prevost of Boundary Design. The result is a plan that could allow us to submit funding applications for redevelopment by August 31 even though we may not have a lease extension proposal from the City by then. The plan would require membership approval before submission.

In early July, the Sunnyhill Board submitted a letter to the City requesting action on our request for a lease extension. Specifically, we need details on a lease rate for an extension of at least 20 years beyond 2039. We asked for a response within two weeks. At the time of writing (July 26) there is still no response from the City.

To avoid continued delays, Lee has prepared two different spreadsheets, known as pro formas, for our project’s possible future financing. One shows a “worst-case” scenario that identifies the maximum amount Sunnyhill could pay annually for a lease and still do the project. This lease figure is based on 10% of appraised land value. Within this scenario, Sunnyhill would pay approximately $250,000 per year. Although this would be far more than our current lease payment, the analysis is extremely important because it tells us that even at this lease rate Sunnyhill could still maintain a 1.10 debt coverage ratio. In other words, we would still be able to undertake the rehabilitation of our existing buildings and develop the new units while remaining affordable.

The second pro forma that Lee developed is based on what expert consultants at Altus believe would be a fairer market rate for a lease. This scenario would be based on 5.5% of appraised land value. It would translate into a lease rate of approximately $115,000 a year and allow us to have a debt coverage ratio of 1.12. The additional .02 percent would enable us to respond to feedback from the funders (for example, if they were to require additional sustainability measures).

In the July 15 meeting, we also discussed the continued lack of a lease proposal from the City. If that continues into August, Lee recommended that Sunnyhill use the worst-case scenario to present to the membership for approval. In that case, we would be voting on the full project with the understanding that there is a maximum lease rate amount we can afford while undertaking the work and remaining affordable. We would then submit our funding applications to CMHC and FCM using the second pro forma as described above, using the annual lease rate of approximately $115,000.

In our funding applications, we would provide logic for the proposed lease rate and affirm that the City would be a partner in the project, as they have told us they would be. After submitting our applications, we would then share them with the City and thus force them to respond. The City might respond favourably and finally provide us with a reasonable lease rate. This strategy is not our preferred approach, but it is an elegant way to sidestep the months-long silence from the City. It allows us to submit our funding applications and at the same time pressure the City to respond.

Planning and Development Committee - End of June Update

Submitted by Phil Cox on behalf of Planning & Development

We remain in a holding pattern on lease negotiations with the City. Our new key contact there has been talking with colleagues in the Calgary Real Estate and Development Services (REDS) to arrive on a lease calculation for Sunnyhill. Our consultant, Lee, is monitoring developments and keeping our City Councillor Druh Farrell appraised. At some point, it may make sense for Sunnyhill to send a letter to senior administration seeking to understand the hold-up. Now, with the Municipal election looming closer, new limits are to be imposed on communications and decision-making at City Hall that will last until the October vote.

The lease calculation is critical to the whole package. Without it we cannot know the financial viability of the project. It is the missing piece of information that, once in place, will allow us to see clearly our options for retrofitting the two and three-bedroom units and for replacing four of our one-bedroom units with a new build. We have been told that neither CMHC nor FCM will entertain a proposal until we have the lease arrangement worked out with the City.

At this week’s P&D session with our consultant, Lee, members discussed and approved a “work-around” idea. We agreed to calculate the highest lease rate that we could possibly pay the City to stay on the right side of the debt-to-service ratio limit for Sunnyhill. With this “placeholder” number, we are able to complete the pro-forma and other remaining details, proceed with member approval discussions and then be ready to make adjustments once a final lease rate is put forward by the City.

Watch this space for updates on this situation. There was talk of having our membership meeting and vote on the project before the end of June. This is now be postponed until later in the Summer.

In the meantime, you may wish to review the housing project package in its current state. Click here to view the slides that Lee presented in our April 15th General Meeting.

Over the last three years, we have learned that housing cooperatives are not as well understood in Calgary as they are in Canada’s larger cities where they are more prolific. As it happens, Sunnyhill is the only housing coop in Calgary sitting on leased land. This lack of understanding may be a factor contributing to our halting process with the City. By contrast, Vancouver has had a framework in place since 2017 to guide negotiations for end-of-lease situations. In that city there are over 200 sites where City land is on lease to coop or affordable housing projects. This is not to say that everything is rosy for housing coops dealing with Vancouver City Hall. There are issues there too. To catch a glimpse of how housing cooperatives are recognized and dealt with in the City of Vancouver, click here.

Planning and Development Committee - Housing Project Highlights for the Week of May 31st, 2021

Submitted by Phil Cox on behalf of Planning & Development

Over the past weeks, personnel changes at the City have affected the pace of the conversation regarding lease options. This week our consultant Lee briefed our new key contact, Daniel Jay, with a walking tour of Sunnyhill. Daniel has been given a mandate to address the lingering question of how best to assign a value to the land for the purpose of setting a lease rate. Three commonly used approaches are: a) capitalization - assessing return on investment after factoring revenue and expenses, but this is not appropriate for a cooperative structure (an ownership model); b) direct comparison - assessing value based on another property with close to identical characteristics, but Sunnyhill is unique in this market; and c) pattern identification from similar leasing scenarios - looking for patterns in institutional land lease examples (airports, hospitals, other housing entities) across Canada. We are agreed that this is the most plausible valuation approach. Daniel will discuss this approach with colleagues in the days ahead. Early indications are that, using this method, it should be possible to come up with a lease rate that will make our housing project viable.

Having the lease rate established is absolutely critical to our progress. Our original plan was to bring the project to the membership and then make it ready for submission to FCM and CMHC by the end of May. Today, Lee confirmed that the funders will not consider our application for funding unless the pro-forma is complete with a clear signal of the City’s intent regarding lease arrangements. The project write up is mostly ready for presentation to Sunnyhill and then, if approved, submission. We just need the land valuation figure. A Sunnyhill membership meeting is tentatively set for the latter part of June. More details on this shortly.

We have asked Lee to update Councilor Farrell’s office and to ask for clarification on transaction project thresholds that would necessitate a decision by Council (as opposed to a sign-off by City administration). Our hope is to avoid having to go to Council. This scenario is now complicated by the upcoming municipal election.

Planning & Development Update

Submitted by Eric Moschopedis on behalf of Planning & Development

Hi everyone,

Just an update on how things are going at Planning and Development.

So far this year we have made some significant progress. We have been having weekly meetings with Lee from Boundary Design and Leighton from Urban Matters. 

This month we received two draft documents from Altus. Altus have been contracted by Boundary Design to cost our development and appraise the value of our assets and land. We have been going through these documents carefully with Lee from Boundary Design.

The first of these documents was the land appraisal. The appraisal gives us three figures: The unencumbered land value, the encumbered land value and the as improved value. To break these down, the unencumbered value is how much the land is worth as an undeveloped empty plot, the encumbered value is that same value but encumbered by Sunnyhill’s lease until 2039 and the as improved value is the “as is” value of Sunnyhill as an existing housing development. This document will be crucial in our land purchase negotiations with the City.

The second document was a draft Class C cost estimate for both the new build and the renovation of the existing units. The designs for the new build and the re-cladding are not finalized but this estimate gives us a good idea of what is attainable for Sunnyhill. This estimate when finalized will also be used in our negotiations with the City.

We will be working on finalizing these documents in the coming weeks. Our main priority is the land purchase, everything hinges on this. We have been working on a package to present to the City to get the best deal for us. Once we have an acceptable offer from the City, we will then be able to come up with an affordable budget for our developments.

Boundary design has also been working with Dialog , a company who specialize in sustainable and net zero building designs to make sure that our plans meet the sustainability targets required by our funding partners.

Once things warm up a bit, we will have a geotechnical survey performed possibly including some borehole drilling to assess the site for development.


Several Updates from Planning and Development

Submitted by Eric Moschopedis on behalf of Planning and Development

Hello neighbours,

So sorry for not being in touch with you all more over the last while. There have been some strange developments and some exciting work to share with you. Please see below:

Relationship with Urban Matters

Over the past two months there were some things happening that, for a while, looked like they were going to have some negative effects on our project, but they have been resolved and we are back on track. In October, Planning and Development was informed that Lee Prevost had been laid off from Urban Matters. This was a huge shock to both Planning and Development and to Lee. In short, Urban Matters has decided to move away from working with affordable housing providers that are doing major development projects. It was explained to us that because affordable housing providers are grant reliant, the risk of working with the sector was too great. Urban Matters will likely still do some targeted work with not-for-profits, but not large-scale work. Sunnyhill was not the only organization affected by this sudden change. Lee was working with 11 different organizations across the country.

The change led to two months of negotiations and hard work for Urban Matters, Lee, Planning and Development, and the Board. We have now arrived at a solution: Urban Matters has hired Lee on contract to complete Phase 2 of the work plan for us. The Phase 2 Extension, Phase 3, and subsequent work will be conducted by Boundary Design, Lee’s private development company that he founded in 2001. The company has been on hiatus for the past seven years while Lee worked with the City of Calgary and Urban Matters. The good news is that we are ultimately dealing with just a change of name from Urban Matters to Boundary Design. We will still get to work with Lee and all the subcontractors (MODA, Altus, etc.) that Lee had been working with at Urban Matters.

Suffice it to say, it was nerve-wracking to see our work come to a sudden halt and sit largely idle for so long. But as of late last week, we are up and running again. Running we are! So much work to catch up on.

New Build Design

As a result of the slowdown, MODA has been in a bit of a holding pattern. They shared one-bedroom unit layouts that they made to simply test the square footages of one bedroom units. The design group will be able to workshop more detailed layout options in the future. Additionally, MODA ran a draft of the design permit drawings past Planning and Development, but there are some corrections that needed to be made and we are awaiting these.

Other pieces of work

In addition to the design work, Lee has now started tackling other elements of Phase 2 that have been sitting idle. This includes completing the site assessment (geotechnical work etc.), undertaking a land valuation for our negotiations with the City of Calgary, reviewing the affordable housing needs assessment for our area written by Urban Matters, and of course working through both capital budgets and operating scenarios. All of these will be fed into the ongoing negotiations with the City of Calgary.

City of Calgary Land Purchase Negotiations

As you may recall, Planning and Development submitted a letter to the City of Calgary in May 2020 to trigger clause 19.01 of our current lease that permits us to purchase the land at “fair market value”. As a result, the City of Calgary conducted an assessment of the land and responded that fair market value was $20 million dollars. Planning and Development anticipated a high valuation, but in conversations with Lee we don’t believe the value-to-use ratio for the land is accurate (many different factors indicate this). More importantly, the City can sell it to Sunnyhill for less and has consistently indicated that this is their intention. Our job will be working with the City to do so. This of course is an exercise in bureaucracy, but it also opens the door for us to formally begin negotiations. The purchase price that Sunnyhill is looking at is much closer to the “book value” of the land which, as we understand, is closer to $5.5 million dollars. Purchasing land at book value is a practice that the City of Calgary uses when selling property to not-for-profits through their Land Disbursement Strategy (LDS). This strategy sells land to not-for-profit organizations that meet a number of different criteria and more importantly through an open bid process. Sunnyhill meets all of the criteria for the LDS, but we simply cannot have the land be put out to an open bid process as it is possible another not-for-profit housing provider could purchase the land we currently live on. So attmpting to use the LDS as is won’t work for us.

What is the way forward? In addition to negotiating a land purchase price, Sunnyhill needs to navigate different levels of administration and seek to amend the LDS in order to allow not-for-profit organizations to purchase land currently occupied or used by not-for-profit organizations without an open bid process. This task should not be as daunting as it appears. Based on Lee’s experience working in the City of Calgary’s Affordable Housing Department and having helped to develop the Affordable Housing Strategy, we have a strong plan to make our case. In particular, Sunnyhill needs to argue its case in relation to the City of Calgary’s existing affordable housing offerings, situate ourselves within the affordable housing sector, emphasize Sunnyhill’s background and successful history, and of course speak to the financial analysis that indicates our capacity to grow and remain sustainable and affordable.

To facilitate this process, the Board and Planning and Development have struck a negotiating team to work with Lee. We will quote Richard Harrison’s recent letter to the co-op:

"Under the continued guidance of Lee Prevost, a negotiating team made up of myself, Eric Moschopedis from P&D, and Sherry Kozak, with Sarah Stephens from the Board and Bob Bott from P&D, will be helping to shape the narrative with which we will be approaching the City. Our backups are Mark Terrell, Phil Cox, and David Broadhead. The mandate is, as it has been from the start, to negotiate the purchase of the land at a price we can afford.”

Phase 2 extension and Phase 3

Phase 2 has been very successful thus far. We have seen the overall project move forward in leaps and bounds. However, there is still additional work to be completed. In particular, we need to evaluate the new build and retrofit schematics with greater scrutiny towards becoming net zero ready (NZR). NZR is a requirement of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities Green Municipal Fund, for which Sunnyhill was awarded $112,000. NRZ is a stricter standard than that of the CHMC funding programs and the targets we were seeking to hit when Phase 2 began. Ideally, we would have integrated some of this work more fully into the design phase of the new building, but confirmation of the funding came late in the process. That said, MODA did design the building with an eye towards NZR, and it just needs to be looked at by a specialist. Of the $112,000 awarded, $16,000 is allocated to pay for a sustainability consultant to work with MODA to ensure the new build and existing townhouses meet the necessary requirements.

Phase 2 will seamlessly merge with Phase 3 and will see Boundary Design (Lee’s company) produce final recommendations for us. Planning and Development is expecting to receive a fully costed Phase 2 extension and Phase 3 proposal in the coming days. We will bring this to membership for approval shortly after.

Planning & Development Update- General Meeting August 22, 2020

Submitted by David Broadhead

In 2019 we requested $200,000 to support an evidence based due diligence process to confirm and advance the deep green retro fitting of our exiting townhouses and better understand what work needs to be done to provide accessible, aging in place units.

We contracted Urban Matters to lead us through this process. Urban Matters broke the scope of the work down in to 3 Phases — with each subsequent phase building on the information gathered from the previous — and always with an eye towards becoming shovel ready.

This included in Phase 1

Project initiation – identifying goals, timeline, participants

Engagement with membership

Accessibility analysis of our property as it is

The production of a schematic design concept for our deep energy retrofit by MODA

Identify sustainability opportunities, i.e. green sustainability

Create an asset management plan and identify areas that need on going work and decision making by the membership

And lastly, Provide three primary recommendations: pursue the sustainable deep green retrofit, seek a land purchase agreement from the City of Calgary, and study the possibility of building new accessible, aging in place housing.

These recommendations were approved by the membership in January 2020.

Phase 2 turned our focus to the potential new building, understanding our finances, and continued negotiations with the City.

Phase 2 includes the following Work

Design Work

Project Costing

Stakeholder Engagement 

Site Assessment including Appraisal

Value Engineering

By fall 2020 we will have completed this process. Cost will be within range of our original estimate of $200,0000 with small adjustments in categories. Phase 1 and Phase 2 were funded within the original motion and included a $25,000 preservation Funding Grant from CMHC.

Movements before undertaking work in phase 2, Urban Matters directed us to a new funding opportunity that could offset costs associated with Phase 2 and all future work. The Canadian Federation of Municipalities has created the Green Municipal Fund. This program is designed to complement  CHMC’s funding programs, but requires greater energy efficiency targets to be met. In particular new buildings must be Net Zero ready. The green municipal fund also supports land purchase and provides greater granting levels than CMHC. So you can see why we would have chosen to pursue this funding. It could reduce the overall mortgage amount that SHC needs to borrow.

To accommodate these stricter guidelines and we have had to expand the scope of phase 2 to include a Sustainability Consultant to work alongside MODA - to ensure we are meeting Net Zero Ready targets. And there was an opportunity to further study the exterior accessibility changes that would be necessary for our grounds — in particular the ice build up in the winter and flash flooding in the summer on our pathways.

In May 2020 SHC applied for $116,865 from the Green Municipal Fund to pay for Phase 2, the sustainability consultant, accessibility engineer, and Phase 3. We will be learning the results of this funding by the fall.

If we received this funding it will mean that we have reduced SHC’s contribution to phases 1, 2 and 3 by approximately half. If we don’t get the grant, we still need to undertake this work to continue moving us towards our goal which is preparation for Capital or Development funding.

So, let me break things down like this. To complete the additional tasks in phase 2 that satisfy the Green Municipal Fund, we need

$16,538 for the sustainability consultant

$8269 for the pathway accessibility study

Phase 3 sits within the scope of the original motion, but requires an additional 

$2,000.00 to explore partnership opportunities — This is to cover explorations with potential capital and operating income partners for our project.

and $11,800 for Urban Matters to complete a final recommendation report. The final recommendation report will Present a final redevelopment recommendation that summarizes the most feasible development program and includes next steps related to design, site, planning support, financial analysis and funding opportunities. Include schematic concepts provided by the design consultant. Urban Matters’ goal is to help identify development concepts that are appropriately-sized and financially feasible. 

Although tasks 2 and 3 will be completed in the fall there is new or additional work that needs to be completed in response to the land lease negotiation process, upcoming grant preparation, and ongoing consultation with Urban Matters. 

Negotiations with the City for the purchase of our land are moving slowly and will require additional work from SHC and Urban Matters to reach our goals. Specifically, our lease states that we have the option to purchase the land at Market Value. That is what SHC agreed to 42 years ago. This means the city needs to understand what market value for the land is as its starting position. They have determined it is valued at 20 million dollars. We know, and the City knows, that this is not feasible for SHC. But the city had to come up with this number to dot their “i”s and cross their “t”s.

We now need to work with Affordable Housing to push internally to bring this cost in line with SHC’s capacity. We are all still aiming for book value, which we understand is approximately 5.5 million.

So this new body of work functions as a phase 3.5 with the emphasis of getting us to a full phase 4 process.

The money required for the next bit of work is not tied to any granting program. So it is money that we need to spend as a Co-op. 

The tasks and funding required are as follows:

Land purchase proposal and negotiations $6,300.00

Value Engineering and Financial Refinement $5,500.00 - meaning continuing to work our operating budget and pro forma in relation to proposed costs of the land. (The goal here is to prove to the city definitely what we can afford while still remaining affordable).

In addition to these specific amounts we request approval of up to $10,000.00 for General Consulting fees from now until December 31.

Given that our budget for 2021 will not be approved for sometime we also request approval of up to $10,000 for General Consulting Fees for January through June 2021.

We are distributing a new proposal from Urban Matters explaining this stage of our project in greater detail.

New Build Update

Submitted by Phil Cox

Earlier in the summer, Planning and Development put out a call for members to be part of a design reference group. The group, 24 members strong and diverse, is engaged with MODA the architect working under Urban Matters.

Having earlier confirmed that the best and pretty much only site for a new build coincides with four of the eight one bedroom units, MODA’s current task is to develop “massing” ideas for the site. These are design concepts created to meet the specifics of the site along with other requirements like: affordability, accessibility/adaptability and member preferences as understood to date. They are not detailed drawings, as yet.

On July 23rd, MODA presented five options for consideration. In the Zoom call, the MODA team asked us to take away the pdf document from the meeting and state our preferences.

On August 6th, the reference group met again with MODA. They presented a reduced field of candidate drawings each embellished with more detail and adapted to consider the feedback received. The MODA team again asked us to provide feedback on each of the three models presented.


As you can see from the photos above, the three “next stage” massing options that were presented are stylistically quite different from each other. On August 8th, members of the design reference group met at the little free library to debrief the discussion and provide another round of guidance.

We scored the “spaceship” model ahead of the “village” model but asked that the two remain in play for the next round. Other highlights on the advice given were (in no particular order):

  • at least eight of the 15 units to be one bedrooms;

  • covered balconies please, sized to be roughly comparable to what we already have in our two and three bedroom units;

  • preference for common space over greenhouses (maintenance concerns);

  • some variability over units sizing and specs, but with caution that we don’t want to create a pricing nightmare or to introduce concerns related to potential inequality.

  • We mentioned that aspect and lighting are important for all units.

  • We discussed common space uses and proportions with consensus that we don’t need a space to occupy everyone, by any means;

  • that it should be a versatile space to handle usual gathering sizes with a modest kitchen;

  • and that the cost burden of such a space would have to be a consideration given our overall need to keep the whole project affordable.

  • We said there should be provision for an office.

    So now MODA is to take our latest feedback and pour more detail into the two preferred massing options. In the third week of August, the MODA team will present their next, more detailed ideas and drawings to the reference group. Following this, the reference group will meet again to address a final set of questions prior to MODA / Urban Matters submitting their recommendations to the Coop. We will invite the membership to drop by for the latter part of this session to hear about the current state of thinking. Stay tuned for more information on that.

New Design Build Group Update

Submitted by Cindy and Eric

The New Build Design Group was originally going to meet with MODA twice a week for short session. Instead, the group will be meeting with MODA and Urban Matters every two weeks on Thursday evenings to discuss the design process. We will also meet on the Saturdays (2 pm) following the Thursday meetings without MODA and Urban Matters. This will give us an opportunity to digest what we learned, ask questions of P and D, and prepare some group feedback. If you would like to participate in these session, please contact P and D.

New Building Update

Submitted by Cindy and Eric

A lot has been happening with P and D over the last few weeks with a bulk of the work happening behind the scenes. This has included work on our pro forma and cost estimates, land lease negotiations, the needs assessment, and geotechnical work. But this post is about the potential new build!

P and D put out a call to the membership to join a New Build Design Group. We got a tremendous response with 22 members joining the group. On July 23, most of us were able to meet with MODA for a 90 minute session. They began by explaining to the group that they were tasked by Urban Matters to look at our entire property to see what opportunities we have for placing new units. As you will see below MODA looked at three options: a series of micro houses dotted throughout the property, a long skinny building next to the escarpment, and where the current one-bedroom units are. Their analysis confirmed what our previous consultant, P and D, and Urban Matters had long suspected—that the most appropriate site is where our current one-bedroom units are located. Please take a look below as MODA outlines the pros and cons for each site.

SITE OPTIONS

20200720_Sunnyhill Housing_Site Options.jpg

NAPKIN SKETCHES

Following this analysis MODA presented 5 different “napkin sketch” models. The designs that they were presented are be best viewed as themes, not final designs. Throughout the meeting members were able to provide feedback and ask questions. Following MODA’s presentation, the New Build Design Group was tasked with some homework. We were asked to email our top 2-3 themes/designs, a pros and cons list for each choice, and any additional feedback to Urban Matters and MODA. With this information MODA will be able to expand 2 or 3 themes. Their updated work will be presented at our next meeting Thursday, August 6th.

Below you can see the 5 themes that MODA presented.

2020-07-23 Sunnyhill HousingMassing Studies .jpg
2020-07-23 Sunnyhill HousingMassing Studies 2.jpg
2020-07-23 Sunnyhill HousingMassing Studies 3.jpg
2020-07-23 Sunnyhill HousingMassing Studies 4.jpg
2020-07-23 Sunnyhill HousingMassing Studies 5.jpg
image003.jpg
image001.jpg
image002.jpg
image004.jpg

WATCH THE PRESENTATION

Below you can watch a short excerpt from the presentation. It is valuable to hear MODA discuss their thinking and provide context for their design decisions.

Password: Andreaintheoffice

Seeking Members for New Build Design Group

The time has come for the membership to talk with MODA architects as they develop their design concepts for the new building. During the next two months or so, MODA will be available for two short 15-30 minute meetings each week to give updates. They want feedback from a diverse selection of the membership. Particularly members who can express their personal thoughts in balance with the needs of the coop.

P and D is asking interested members to fill out the short survey below so that we can invite the most diverse panel to participate regularly in these briefings and feedback sessions. The meetings will also be open to the general membership, but we want to ensure good representation across the co-op, throughout the process.

Introduction to MODA

Password: Andrea

On June 18, 2020 MODA provided an introduction to the memberships about how they work and the process they will lead the membership through as we work to design a new building.

Modern Office of Design + Architecture (MODA) is the Calgary-based architecture and interior design firm that Urban Matters is working with to envision what our aging-in-place, accessible housing might look like. MODA is the same firm that did the design work for our 2 and 3 bedroom in the fall. They offer a collaborative, team-oriented approach to all projects, big or small. MODA’s work ranges from single family residences to institutional projects such as libraries, schools, art galleries and fire halls to multifamily and mid-scale office, retail and commercial buildings.

If you have questions, please submit the here:

Ask a Question

ASK A QUESTION

Do you have a question about the retrofit, new build, land negotiations, or any other work Planning and Development is doing? Your question will be added to our growing database. If we already have the answer, we will get back to you ASAP. Other questions will be added to the database and addressed when we get to the relevant part of the process. Don’t be shy!

Succession Planning Update

Submitted by Eric on behalf of Planning and Development

Planning and Development worked with Social Committee Chair Rachel Rose to submit a grant to the City of Calgary’s Affordable Housing “Home Program”. The Home Program grant provides upto $25,000 and aims to provide one-time funding to projects that stimulate innovative, lasting, positive changes in the housing system by advancing one of the key program priority areas. Our application focused on: Community inclusion and integration — Increase participation, engagement and involvement of individuals with the local community, services and supports.

This grant marks an important first step towards strenghthening our relationships with each other, our governance processes, and the operational processes of Sunnyhill.

We are posting a large section of the grant below and are encouraging our neighbours to read through it all. It’ll take you a bit of time and might be a bit boring, but this can be your first step in engaging in what will otherwise be an exciting process!

Thank you to Rachel and Phil for their leadership and hard work!

Project Description

To undertake a robust succession planning process that can re-invigorate and re-tool the social assets of the Sunnyhill Housing Cooperative. By doing so, we can create deeper engagement within the community, retain tenants, and sustain the self management model of our society as it secures the long term future of the coop. All of these combined will ensure the affordability of our housing.


Project Need: Succession Planning: Residency and Engagement at Sunnyhill Housing Cooperative

After 40 plus years of relative stability, we now find ourselves in a place of transition. Currently, we are working to purchase our leased land from the City of Calgary and are undergoing a move to secure the long-term future of the coop. We are nearing the end of our long-term mortgage and, as a result, in 2018 began embarking upon an ambitious capital project to overhaul the declining physical state of our buildings while also expanding our capacity to support current and future members to age in place by building a new multi-unit low rise apartment.

As we begin this project, we understand that it is on us, the membership, to establish a solid social and organizational infrastructure so that we remain a vibrant, inclusive and affordable community for all who call it home. We recognize that the physical changes we are undertaking are of a magnitude requiring that we also pay special attention to our social assets. Our community functions related to governance, management and operations need to be cared for. Indeed, we can see from the significant amount of decision-making that has already occured in these early days of our housing upgrade project, that we need to be at the top of our game to navigate the upgrade itself. We are making million dollar decisions related to: land tenure, long term financing, building upgrade designs and materials, new build possibilities, temporary member relocation and other disruption variables, and the possible integration of 15 new households into our 66 unit community. As a community we are excited, but on the very edge of our comfort zone. We are now at an exciting place where we must take the collective knowledge of 42 years of cooperative living and plan for our future. In doing so, we will be able to increase participation and engagement among the membership, therefore ensuring affordability and the long term tenancy of our members.

Our housing cooperative is an inner-city community with 66 units ranging from 1-3 bedrooms. About half of the households have been here twenty years or more. Our membership averages 160 people and we rely on volunteers to oversee community function and governance—this is what allows our rents to remain, on average, 20% below market rents. Approximately half of our member households have at least one person on a committee, but more accurately there is a core group of 25 members who undertake the bulk of the work. Of these 25 members nearly 85% are near retirement age or older. We must train up new and younger members. This will ensure the ongoing affordability of the cooperative, but it will also establish pride of place. The result being long-term engagement and the retention of residents.

We understand that these numbers put us in a good light when compared with other housing societies, but we know that we can expect better (and will need to) if we want to avoid reliance on a fuller service property management model that could compromise our cooperative ethic and drive up our housing charges.

Even though the cooperative movement has a long history in Canada, and across many sectors, as entities they remain a bit of a mystery to the mainstream. Cooperatives represent a rare form of deliberative democracy where members' labor and participation helps to off-set cost of housing. Members, current and prospective, have varying degrees of experience with what it is to be living (and co-managing) in a cooperative. Even in normal times (i.e. when not engaged in large scale infrastructure development projects), members are tested by the volume of governance required to keep buildings, grounds and membership aspects in good order. In our current transition and growth we worry more than normal about member conflict, fatigue and burnout. As an organization we need to establish and develop skills to mitigate this occurring. It doesn’t help that we, with the rest of the world, are in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

We have not done a formal skills/interests mapping exercise for a long time (our last member survey was done in 2013), but we know informally of the diverse talents and collective experience that resides within - some tapped, some not yet so. Succession planning or mentoring younger and/or newer members into leadership roles has to be a priority.

Since inception in the late 1970s, Sunnyhill has had an operating agreement with CMHC that shaped our systems and our business routines. When we exited this agreement in 2018 under a federal program to help coops find relief from high interest agreements, we essentially switched off our auto-pilot and took on new strategic decision-making roles in relation to our long term housing and finances.

As noted, we are on the edge of our comfort zone with the scope and magnitude of the decisions we are making. It is important, right now, to take stock of what members are currently experiencing and what they need in order to feel connected, engaged and secure in the future. Key questions include:

  • Do our members see a long-term future for themselves at Sunnyhill?

  • Do they feel safe, listened too, cared for, and connected?

  • What should participation mean in our housing co-operative?

  • What are the barriers to active participation and engagement in our community?

  • Does our governance actively serve and facilitate community well-being?

  • What can we do to ensure more stability and deeper connections within our cooperative?

  • To be successful, what must we protect as we proceed? What should we lose? What do we need that we don’t already have?

To be a strong and resilient affordable housing cooperative for the future, we need to have answers to these questions. The intention is to run a parallel and intersecting community development process alongside the capital infrastructure projects we are undertaking. By doing this we are ensuring that Sunnyhill Housing Cooperative has the governance, social, and community infrastructure necessary to be a successful and affordable housing provider for decades to come.


Project Details

This project funding will support Sunnyhill to undertake the important initial stages of a succession planning process. By doing this, we will be able to thoughtfully understand and map our social, organizational, and governance assets, collaborate with membership to develop a sustainable engagement model, and begin the important work of succession planning. As a cooperative democracy—where members’ labour directly offsets operating expenses—we must have sustained participation to keep housing costs well below market rates. Put another way, to retain affordability and tenancy, Sunnyhill requires increased participation and engagement within the community. To undertake a succession planning process, we will need the expertise of an external consultant. Our Planning and Development Committee mandated to lead Sunnyhill’s housing infrastructure activities, will involve the membership in a scoping discussion that culminates in a terms of reference. This ToR will allow us to clarify: purpose, scope, guiding questions, budget allocations, time frame and contract management aspects.

Using the ToRs, we will launch a competition for an external consultant. To start, the successful candidate will cultivate relationships and rapport with the membership—fostering trust and ensuring that the needs and desires of the community are integrated into the consultant’s work program. Our intention with the ToRs is to provide clear parameters while also encouraging the consultant to bring to the task their experience and creativity.

We envision a qualitative and quantitative data collection phase. This phase would include, but is not limited to, a member survey, interactive dialogue and focus groups, collating statistical information, and document reviews. By being open and rigorous in our processes we will be able to generate both anecdotal and analytical information that can inform smart decisions based on evidence.

Deliverables we would see from this work includes the following:

  • An asset map showing community resources (social assets) and offering some means for rating risks and potential benefits associated with each.

    • This will help us to better understand the make-up of Sunnyhill—what it will take over the next five years to keep/make it an attractive and stable community to call home.

  • A member engagement plan and process that we can use to help us broaden and deepen member identification with cooperative living.

    • We know that cooperative living requires more skills than traditional living and we need our members to have the knowledge, skills and abilities to live and work together with agency and respect. The plan will include implicit bias and diversity training for members. While we consider ourselves a diverse community we know biases must be uncovered and the dignity of all people embraced.

  • A review of best practices, both locally and globally, around community and social assets management in housing cooperatives.

  • We can draw upon this “tool box” to help us manage our day to day routines and our big housing project tasks.

To produce these deliverables, the consultant will use a collaborative inquiry method aimed at “discovery”. We anticipate a series of interactive sessions such as charrettes, kitchen table talks or visioning workshops to ensure that membership has a chance to fully understand and take ownership of what we learn together. We will ensure that all new content associated with the three deliverables is validated by the membership.

Toward the close of the process and on the strength of all that has been learned, the membership will be invited to come up with ideas/solutions that they would like to lead. This will allow the membership to test processes of engagement. Sunnyhill will allocate up to $500 toward four to six Community Asset Seed projects—ideas deemed most promising against pre-established criteria. These criteria will be aligned with the goal of this project. In adding this practice component to the project, we are:

  • Enacting ideas/solutions generated in the collaborative inquiry

  • Drawing on homegrown talents/experience discovered

  • Demonstrating possibilities that give momentum internally and contribute toward the work of other revitalization initiatives.

Regarding the latter point, a final step in the project will be a Webinar in which we share what we have learned. We will look to allied network organizations to assist in this dissemination including the Cooperative Housing Foundation of Canada (CHF) and the Southern Alberta Cooperative Housing Association (SACHA). We are members of both. We would also engage the Northern Alberta Cooperative Housing Association (NACHA) as well as other non-market housing groups in Calgary such as the Affordable Housing Collective.

The webinar will be produced through in kind contributions from Sunnyhill members and others. The production team will be led by Eric Moschopedis and Mia Rushton on behalf of Sunnyhill. Our membership includes professional writers and filmmakers among others who will support this production. We also have a full time Property Manager on site to act as a resource person for this project.

Project deliverables and the webinar will ultimately be posted on the Sunnyhill web page - some content on the public side, other content on the member side of the site. Our website receives 1000 visits on average per month.


Project Timeline and Reporting

Upon confirmation of the grant we anticipate a 1-year timeline for the work to unfold

We recognize that succession planning and its implementation is a multi-phased process. Community building and engagement require time. However we can expect a few clear outcomes on this first very important phase of the process.

The three streams of this work: Asset Mapping, Engagement Plan and Best Practices Report will be tangible outcomes of this work ready to guide the planning of our social infrastructure for the next 5 years.

The energy, innovation and uptake of the information in these reports by membership will be qualified in the community asset seed funding projects. We will know that membership has started on the path toward taking ownership of building our social infrastructure when their ideas for action are vocalized and collaboratively put into action.

We currently have 60% of membership serving in volunteer roles, some with more responsibilities than others. Our attendance at general meetings averages about 40% of our households. We will know that this project is working when we see broad participation in the process we are proposing and increase to these numbers.

This project will act as confirmation that our governance structure is fit for purpose. We will have a clear 5-year plan for what engagement and participation means to us at Sunnyhill and what good housing means for our membership.

Our insight and learnings as a community will become formalized through the sharing in our Webinar.

Outputs

We will track the number of members who participate in the Terms of Reference and scoping process along with the data collection methods. Throughout the year we will also continue to track attendance at regular meetings and volunteer numbers of various committees. The workshops and engagement processes utilized to share the data back will also be tracked, as well as the number of pitches for the Community Asset Seed Funding projects.

Section F: Sustainability

Immediately, we will have a clear course of action for how to proceed with our community building initiatives holistically. We will also have a clearer understanding of what the needs, liabilities and untapped resources are within the community, information right now that is unknown to us. By creating more opportunities for participation through the Community Asset Seed projects, along with the integration of engagement projects across all areas of governance, we anticipate we will see more participation in all areas of the community and governance. By encouraging our community to intentionally begin thinking about our social infrastructure and its significance, we anticipate we will see a renewed sense of community. These conversations and the inquiry process will give memberships an invitation to renew their sense of pride in cooperative living and the ethics of equality and democracy inherent to it.

The long-term goal of this project is succession planning. We want to see less turnover in our community. By creating sustained engagement and participation in all areas of our governance and operations, we can achieve this goal. We want Sunnyhill to be a place where all members feel safe, connected and see a future for themselves with longevity and meaning. Sunnyhill has already shown itself to be a stable long-term home for some members, but the more stability and engagement we see across membership year to year, the more we will know that we have made this shift.

Member Login
Welcome, (First Name)!

Forgot? Show
Log In
Enter Member Area
My Profile Not a member? Sign up. Log Out