Sentry Page Protection

Planning and Development

Important Membership Information for P & D Financing Plan Options


Submitted by Eric Moschopedis and Bob Bott on behalf of Planning & Development

Planning and Development had an important meeting July 15 with our lead consultant, Lee Prevost of Boundary Design. The result is a plan that could allow us to submit funding applications for redevelopment by August 31 even though we may not have a lease extension proposal from the City by then. The plan would require membership approval before submission.

In early July, the Sunnyhill Board submitted a letter to the City requesting action on our request for a lease extension. Specifically, we need details on a lease rate for an extension of at least 20 years beyond 2039. We asked for a response within two weeks. At the time of writing (July 26) there is still no response from the City.

To avoid continued delays, Lee has prepared two different spreadsheets, known as pro formas, for our project’s possible future financing. One shows a “worst-case” scenario that identifies the maximum amount Sunnyhill could pay annually for a lease and still do the project. This lease figure is based on 10% of appraised land value. Within this scenario, Sunnyhill would pay approximately $250,000 per year. Although this would be far more than our current lease payment, the analysis is extremely important because it tells us that even at this lease rate Sunnyhill could still maintain a 1.10 debt coverage ratio. In other words, we would still be able to undertake the rehabilitation of our existing buildings and develop the new units while remaining affordable.

The second pro forma that Lee developed is based on what expert consultants at Altus believe would be a fairer market rate for a lease. This scenario would be based on 5.5% of appraised land value. It would translate into a lease rate of approximately $115,000 a year and allow us to have a debt coverage ratio of 1.12. The additional .02 percent would enable us to respond to feedback from the funders (for example, if they were to require additional sustainability measures).

In the July 15 meeting, we also discussed the continued lack of a lease proposal from the City. If that continues into August, Lee recommended that Sunnyhill use the worst-case scenario to present to the membership for approval. In that case, we would be voting on the full project with the understanding that there is a maximum lease rate amount we can afford while undertaking the work and remaining affordable. We would then submit our funding applications to CMHC and FCM using the second pro forma as described above, using the annual lease rate of approximately $115,000.

In our funding applications, we would provide logic for the proposed lease rate and affirm that the City would be a partner in the project, as they have told us they would be. After submitting our applications, we would then share them with the City and thus force them to respond. The City might respond favourably and finally provide us with a reasonable lease rate. This strategy is not our preferred approach, but it is an elegant way to sidestep the months-long silence from the City. It allows us to submit our funding applications and at the same time pressure the City to respond.

Planning and Development Committee - End of June Update

Submitted by Phil Cox on behalf of Planning & Development

We remain in a holding pattern on lease negotiations with the City. Our new key contact there has been talking with colleagues in the Calgary Real Estate and Development Services (REDS) to arrive on a lease calculation for Sunnyhill. Our consultant, Lee, is monitoring developments and keeping our City Councillor Druh Farrell appraised. At some point, it may make sense for Sunnyhill to send a letter to senior administration seeking to understand the hold-up. Now, with the Municipal election looming closer, new limits are to be imposed on communications and decision-making at City Hall that will last until the October vote.

The lease calculation is critical to the whole package. Without it we cannot know the financial viability of the project. It is the missing piece of information that, once in place, will allow us to see clearly our options for retrofitting the two and three-bedroom units and for replacing four of our one-bedroom units with a new build. We have been told that neither CMHC nor FCM will entertain a proposal until we have the lease arrangement worked out with the City.

At this week’s P&D session with our consultant, Lee, members discussed and approved a “work-around” idea. We agreed to calculate the highest lease rate that we could possibly pay the City to stay on the right side of the debt-to-service ratio limit for Sunnyhill. With this “placeholder” number, we are able to complete the pro-forma and other remaining details, proceed with member approval discussions and then be ready to make adjustments once a final lease rate is put forward by the City.

Watch this space for updates on this situation. There was talk of having our membership meeting and vote on the project before the end of June. This is now be postponed until later in the Summer.

In the meantime, you may wish to review the housing project package in its current state. Click here to view the slides that Lee presented in our April 15th General Meeting.

Over the last three years, we have learned that housing cooperatives are not as well understood in Calgary as they are in Canada’s larger cities where they are more prolific. As it happens, Sunnyhill is the only housing coop in Calgary sitting on leased land. This lack of understanding may be a factor contributing to our halting process with the City. By contrast, Vancouver has had a framework in place since 2017 to guide negotiations for end-of-lease situations. In that city there are over 200 sites where City land is on lease to coop or affordable housing projects. This is not to say that everything is rosy for housing coops dealing with Vancouver City Hall. There are issues there too. To catch a glimpse of how housing cooperatives are recognized and dealt with in the City of Vancouver, click here.

Planning and Development Committee - Housing Project Highlights for the Week of May 31st, 2021

Submitted by Phil Cox on behalf of Planning & Development

Over the past weeks, personnel changes at the City have affected the pace of the conversation regarding lease options. This week our consultant Lee briefed our new key contact, Daniel Jay, with a walking tour of Sunnyhill. Daniel has been given a mandate to address the lingering question of how best to assign a value to the land for the purpose of setting a lease rate. Three commonly used approaches are: a) capitalization - assessing return on investment after factoring revenue and expenses, but this is not appropriate for a cooperative structure (an ownership model); b) direct comparison - assessing value based on another property with close to identical characteristics, but Sunnyhill is unique in this market; and c) pattern identification from similar leasing scenarios - looking for patterns in institutional land lease examples (airports, hospitals, other housing entities) across Canada. We are agreed that this is the most plausible valuation approach. Daniel will discuss this approach with colleagues in the days ahead. Early indications are that, using this method, it should be possible to come up with a lease rate that will make our housing project viable.

Having the lease rate established is absolutely critical to our progress. Our original plan was to bring the project to the membership and then make it ready for submission to FCM and CMHC by the end of May. Today, Lee confirmed that the funders will not consider our application for funding unless the pro-forma is complete with a clear signal of the City’s intent regarding lease arrangements. The project write up is mostly ready for presentation to Sunnyhill and then, if approved, submission. We just need the land valuation figure. A Sunnyhill membership meeting is tentatively set for the latter part of June. More details on this shortly.

We have asked Lee to update Councilor Farrell’s office and to ask for clarification on transaction project thresholds that would necessitate a decision by Council (as opposed to a sign-off by City administration). Our hope is to avoid having to go to Council. This scenario is now complicated by the upcoming municipal election.

Planning & Development Update

Submitted by Eric Moschopedis on behalf of Planning & Development

Hi everyone,

Just an update on how things are going at Planning and Development.

So far this year we have made some significant progress. We have been having weekly meetings with Lee from Boundary Design and Leighton from Urban Matters. 

This month we received two draft documents from Altus. Altus have been contracted by Boundary Design to cost our development and appraise the value of our assets and land. We have been going through these documents carefully with Lee from Boundary Design.

The first of these documents was the land appraisal. The appraisal gives us three figures: The unencumbered land value, the encumbered land value and the as improved value. To break these down, the unencumbered value is how much the land is worth as an undeveloped empty plot, the encumbered value is that same value but encumbered by Sunnyhill’s lease until 2039 and the as improved value is the “as is” value of Sunnyhill as an existing housing development. This document will be crucial in our land purchase negotiations with the City.

The second document was a draft Class C cost estimate for both the new build and the renovation of the existing units. The designs for the new build and the re-cladding are not finalized but this estimate gives us a good idea of what is attainable for Sunnyhill. This estimate when finalized will also be used in our negotiations with the City.

We will be working on finalizing these documents in the coming weeks. Our main priority is the land purchase, everything hinges on this. We have been working on a package to present to the City to get the best deal for us. Once we have an acceptable offer from the City, we will then be able to come up with an affordable budget for our developments.

Boundary design has also been working with Dialog , a company who specialize in sustainable and net zero building designs to make sure that our plans meet the sustainability targets required by our funding partners.

Once things warm up a bit, we will have a geotechnical survey performed possibly including some borehole drilling to assess the site for development.


Planning & Development Update- General Meeting August 22, 2020

Submitted by David Broadhead

In 2019 we requested $200,000 to support an evidence based due diligence process to confirm and advance the deep green retro fitting of our exiting townhouses and better understand what work needs to be done to provide accessible, aging in place units.

We contracted Urban Matters to lead us through this process. Urban Matters broke the scope of the work down in to 3 Phases — with each subsequent phase building on the information gathered from the previous — and always with an eye towards becoming shovel ready.

This included in Phase 1

Project initiation – identifying goals, timeline, participants

Engagement with membership

Accessibility analysis of our property as it is

The production of a schematic design concept for our deep energy retrofit by MODA

Identify sustainability opportunities, i.e. green sustainability

Create an asset management plan and identify areas that need on going work and decision making by the membership

And lastly, Provide three primary recommendations: pursue the sustainable deep green retrofit, seek a land purchase agreement from the City of Calgary, and study the possibility of building new accessible, aging in place housing.

These recommendations were approved by the membership in January 2020.

Phase 2 turned our focus to the potential new building, understanding our finances, and continued negotiations with the City.

Phase 2 includes the following Work

Design Work

Project Costing

Stakeholder Engagement 

Site Assessment including Appraisal

Value Engineering

By fall 2020 we will have completed this process. Cost will be within range of our original estimate of $200,0000 with small adjustments in categories. Phase 1 and Phase 2 were funded within the original motion and included a $25,000 preservation Funding Grant from CMHC.

Movements before undertaking work in phase 2, Urban Matters directed us to a new funding opportunity that could offset costs associated with Phase 2 and all future work. The Canadian Federation of Municipalities has created the Green Municipal Fund. This program is designed to complement  CHMC’s funding programs, but requires greater energy efficiency targets to be met. In particular new buildings must be Net Zero ready. The green municipal fund also supports land purchase and provides greater granting levels than CMHC. So you can see why we would have chosen to pursue this funding. It could reduce the overall mortgage amount that SHC needs to borrow.

To accommodate these stricter guidelines and we have had to expand the scope of phase 2 to include a Sustainability Consultant to work alongside MODA - to ensure we are meeting Net Zero Ready targets. And there was an opportunity to further study the exterior accessibility changes that would be necessary for our grounds — in particular the ice build up in the winter and flash flooding in the summer on our pathways.

In May 2020 SHC applied for $116,865 from the Green Municipal Fund to pay for Phase 2, the sustainability consultant, accessibility engineer, and Phase 3. We will be learning the results of this funding by the fall.

If we received this funding it will mean that we have reduced SHC’s contribution to phases 1, 2 and 3 by approximately half. If we don’t get the grant, we still need to undertake this work to continue moving us towards our goal which is preparation for Capital or Development funding.

So, let me break things down like this. To complete the additional tasks in phase 2 that satisfy the Green Municipal Fund, we need

$16,538 for the sustainability consultant

$8269 for the pathway accessibility study

Phase 3 sits within the scope of the original motion, but requires an additional 

$2,000.00 to explore partnership opportunities — This is to cover explorations with potential capital and operating income partners for our project.

and $11,800 for Urban Matters to complete a final recommendation report. The final recommendation report will Present a final redevelopment recommendation that summarizes the most feasible development program and includes next steps related to design, site, planning support, financial analysis and funding opportunities. Include schematic concepts provided by the design consultant. Urban Matters’ goal is to help identify development concepts that are appropriately-sized and financially feasible. 

Although tasks 2 and 3 will be completed in the fall there is new or additional work that needs to be completed in response to the land lease negotiation process, upcoming grant preparation, and ongoing consultation with Urban Matters. 

Negotiations with the City for the purchase of our land are moving slowly and will require additional work from SHC and Urban Matters to reach our goals. Specifically, our lease states that we have the option to purchase the land at Market Value. That is what SHC agreed to 42 years ago. This means the city needs to understand what market value for the land is as its starting position. They have determined it is valued at 20 million dollars. We know, and the City knows, that this is not feasible for SHC. But the city had to come up with this number to dot their “i”s and cross their “t”s.

We now need to work with Affordable Housing to push internally to bring this cost in line with SHC’s capacity. We are all still aiming for book value, which we understand is approximately 5.5 million.

So this new body of work functions as a phase 3.5 with the emphasis of getting us to a full phase 4 process.

The money required for the next bit of work is not tied to any granting program. So it is money that we need to spend as a Co-op. 

The tasks and funding required are as follows:

Land purchase proposal and negotiations $6,300.00

Value Engineering and Financial Refinement $5,500.00 - meaning continuing to work our operating budget and pro forma in relation to proposed costs of the land. (The goal here is to prove to the city definitely what we can afford while still remaining affordable).

In addition to these specific amounts we request approval of up to $10,000.00 for General Consulting fees from now until December 31.

Given that our budget for 2021 will not be approved for sometime we also request approval of up to $10,000 for General Consulting Fees for January through June 2021.

We are distributing a new proposal from Urban Matters explaining this stage of our project in greater detail.

Seeking Members for New Build Design Group

The time has come for the membership to talk with MODA architects as they develop their design concepts for the new building. During the next two months or so, MODA will be available for two short 15-30 minute meetings each week to give updates. They want feedback from a diverse selection of the membership. Particularly members who can express their personal thoughts in balance with the needs of the coop.

P and D is asking interested members to fill out the short survey below so that we can invite the most diverse panel to participate regularly in these briefings and feedback sessions. The meetings will also be open to the general membership, but we want to ensure good representation across the co-op, throughout the process.

Introduction to MODA

Password: Andrea

On June 18, 2020 MODA provided an introduction to the memberships about how they work and the process they will lead the membership through as we work to design a new building.

Modern Office of Design + Architecture (MODA) is the Calgary-based architecture and interior design firm that Urban Matters is working with to envision what our aging-in-place, accessible housing might look like. MODA is the same firm that did the design work for our 2 and 3 bedroom in the fall. They offer a collaborative, team-oriented approach to all projects, big or small. MODA’s work ranges from single family residences to institutional projects such as libraries, schools, art galleries and fire halls to multifamily and mid-scale office, retail and commercial buildings.

If you have questions, please submit the here:

Ask a Question

Succession Planning Update

Submitted by Eric on behalf of Planning and Development

Planning and Development worked with Social Committee Chair Rachel Rose to submit a grant to the City of Calgary’s Affordable Housing “Home Program”. The Home Program grant provides upto $25,000 and aims to provide one-time funding to projects that stimulate innovative, lasting, positive changes in the housing system by advancing one of the key program priority areas. Our application focused on: Community inclusion and integration — Increase participation, engagement and involvement of individuals with the local community, services and supports.

This grant marks an important first step towards strenghthening our relationships with each other, our governance processes, and the operational processes of Sunnyhill.

We are posting a large section of the grant below and are encouraging our neighbours to read through it all. It’ll take you a bit of time and might be a bit boring, but this can be your first step in engaging in what will otherwise be an exciting process!

Thank you to Rachel and Phil for their leadership and hard work!

Project Description

To undertake a robust succession planning process that can re-invigorate and re-tool the social assets of the Sunnyhill Housing Cooperative. By doing so, we can create deeper engagement within the community, retain tenants, and sustain the self management model of our society as it secures the long term future of the coop. All of these combined will ensure the affordability of our housing.


Project Need: Succession Planning: Residency and Engagement at Sunnyhill Housing Cooperative

After 40 plus years of relative stability, we now find ourselves in a place of transition. Currently, we are working to purchase our leased land from the City of Calgary and are undergoing a move to secure the long-term future of the coop. We are nearing the end of our long-term mortgage and, as a result, in 2018 began embarking upon an ambitious capital project to overhaul the declining physical state of our buildings while also expanding our capacity to support current and future members to age in place by building a new multi-unit low rise apartment.

As we begin this project, we understand that it is on us, the membership, to establish a solid social and organizational infrastructure so that we remain a vibrant, inclusive and affordable community for all who call it home. We recognize that the physical changes we are undertaking are of a magnitude requiring that we also pay special attention to our social assets. Our community functions related to governance, management and operations need to be cared for. Indeed, we can see from the significant amount of decision-making that has already occured in these early days of our housing upgrade project, that we need to be at the top of our game to navigate the upgrade itself. We are making million dollar decisions related to: land tenure, long term financing, building upgrade designs and materials, new build possibilities, temporary member relocation and other disruption variables, and the possible integration of 15 new households into our 66 unit community. As a community we are excited, but on the very edge of our comfort zone. We are now at an exciting place where we must take the collective knowledge of 42 years of cooperative living and plan for our future. In doing so, we will be able to increase participation and engagement among the membership, therefore ensuring affordability and the long term tenancy of our members.

Our housing cooperative is an inner-city community with 66 units ranging from 1-3 bedrooms. About half of the households have been here twenty years or more. Our membership averages 160 people and we rely on volunteers to oversee community function and governance—this is what allows our rents to remain, on average, 20% below market rents. Approximately half of our member households have at least one person on a committee, but more accurately there is a core group of 25 members who undertake the bulk of the work. Of these 25 members nearly 85% are near retirement age or older. We must train up new and younger members. This will ensure the ongoing affordability of the cooperative, but it will also establish pride of place. The result being long-term engagement and the retention of residents.

We understand that these numbers put us in a good light when compared with other housing societies, but we know that we can expect better (and will need to) if we want to avoid reliance on a fuller service property management model that could compromise our cooperative ethic and drive up our housing charges.

Even though the cooperative movement has a long history in Canada, and across many sectors, as entities they remain a bit of a mystery to the mainstream. Cooperatives represent a rare form of deliberative democracy where members' labor and participation helps to off-set cost of housing. Members, current and prospective, have varying degrees of experience with what it is to be living (and co-managing) in a cooperative. Even in normal times (i.e. when not engaged in large scale infrastructure development projects), members are tested by the volume of governance required to keep buildings, grounds and membership aspects in good order. In our current transition and growth we worry more than normal about member conflict, fatigue and burnout. As an organization we need to establish and develop skills to mitigate this occurring. It doesn’t help that we, with the rest of the world, are in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

We have not done a formal skills/interests mapping exercise for a long time (our last member survey was done in 2013), but we know informally of the diverse talents and collective experience that resides within - some tapped, some not yet so. Succession planning or mentoring younger and/or newer members into leadership roles has to be a priority.

Since inception in the late 1970s, Sunnyhill has had an operating agreement with CMHC that shaped our systems and our business routines. When we exited this agreement in 2018 under a federal program to help coops find relief from high interest agreements, we essentially switched off our auto-pilot and took on new strategic decision-making roles in relation to our long term housing and finances.

As noted, we are on the edge of our comfort zone with the scope and magnitude of the decisions we are making. It is important, right now, to take stock of what members are currently experiencing and what they need in order to feel connected, engaged and secure in the future. Key questions include:

  • Do our members see a long-term future for themselves at Sunnyhill?

  • Do they feel safe, listened too, cared for, and connected?

  • What should participation mean in our housing co-operative?

  • What are the barriers to active participation and engagement in our community?

  • Does our governance actively serve and facilitate community well-being?

  • What can we do to ensure more stability and deeper connections within our cooperative?

  • To be successful, what must we protect as we proceed? What should we lose? What do we need that we don’t already have?

To be a strong and resilient affordable housing cooperative for the future, we need to have answers to these questions. The intention is to run a parallel and intersecting community development process alongside the capital infrastructure projects we are undertaking. By doing this we are ensuring that Sunnyhill Housing Cooperative has the governance, social, and community infrastructure necessary to be a successful and affordable housing provider for decades to come.


Project Details

This project funding will support Sunnyhill to undertake the important initial stages of a succession planning process. By doing this, we will be able to thoughtfully understand and map our social, organizational, and governance assets, collaborate with membership to develop a sustainable engagement model, and begin the important work of succession planning. As a cooperative democracy—where members’ labour directly offsets operating expenses—we must have sustained participation to keep housing costs well below market rates. Put another way, to retain affordability and tenancy, Sunnyhill requires increased participation and engagement within the community. To undertake a succession planning process, we will need the expertise of an external consultant. Our Planning and Development Committee mandated to lead Sunnyhill’s housing infrastructure activities, will involve the membership in a scoping discussion that culminates in a terms of reference. This ToR will allow us to clarify: purpose, scope, guiding questions, budget allocations, time frame and contract management aspects.

Using the ToRs, we will launch a competition for an external consultant. To start, the successful candidate will cultivate relationships and rapport with the membership—fostering trust and ensuring that the needs and desires of the community are integrated into the consultant’s work program. Our intention with the ToRs is to provide clear parameters while also encouraging the consultant to bring to the task their experience and creativity.

We envision a qualitative and quantitative data collection phase. This phase would include, but is not limited to, a member survey, interactive dialogue and focus groups, collating statistical information, and document reviews. By being open and rigorous in our processes we will be able to generate both anecdotal and analytical information that can inform smart decisions based on evidence.

Deliverables we would see from this work includes the following:

  • An asset map showing community resources (social assets) and offering some means for rating risks and potential benefits associated with each.

    • This will help us to better understand the make-up of Sunnyhill—what it will take over the next five years to keep/make it an attractive and stable community to call home.

  • A member engagement plan and process that we can use to help us broaden and deepen member identification with cooperative living.

    • We know that cooperative living requires more skills than traditional living and we need our members to have the knowledge, skills and abilities to live and work together with agency and respect. The plan will include implicit bias and diversity training for members. While we consider ourselves a diverse community we know biases must be uncovered and the dignity of all people embraced.

  • A review of best practices, both locally and globally, around community and social assets management in housing cooperatives.

  • We can draw upon this “tool box” to help us manage our day to day routines and our big housing project tasks.

To produce these deliverables, the consultant will use a collaborative inquiry method aimed at “discovery”. We anticipate a series of interactive sessions such as charrettes, kitchen table talks or visioning workshops to ensure that membership has a chance to fully understand and take ownership of what we learn together. We will ensure that all new content associated with the three deliverables is validated by the membership.

Toward the close of the process and on the strength of all that has been learned, the membership will be invited to come up with ideas/solutions that they would like to lead. This will allow the membership to test processes of engagement. Sunnyhill will allocate up to $500 toward four to six Community Asset Seed projects—ideas deemed most promising against pre-established criteria. These criteria will be aligned with the goal of this project. In adding this practice component to the project, we are:

  • Enacting ideas/solutions generated in the collaborative inquiry

  • Drawing on homegrown talents/experience discovered

  • Demonstrating possibilities that give momentum internally and contribute toward the work of other revitalization initiatives.

Regarding the latter point, a final step in the project will be a Webinar in which we share what we have learned. We will look to allied network organizations to assist in this dissemination including the Cooperative Housing Foundation of Canada (CHF) and the Southern Alberta Cooperative Housing Association (SACHA). We are members of both. We would also engage the Northern Alberta Cooperative Housing Association (NACHA) as well as other non-market housing groups in Calgary such as the Affordable Housing Collective.

The webinar will be produced through in kind contributions from Sunnyhill members and others. The production team will be led by Eric Moschopedis and Mia Rushton on behalf of Sunnyhill. Our membership includes professional writers and filmmakers among others who will support this production. We also have a full time Property Manager on site to act as a resource person for this project.

Project deliverables and the webinar will ultimately be posted on the Sunnyhill web page - some content on the public side, other content on the member side of the site. Our website receives 1000 visits on average per month.


Project Timeline and Reporting

Upon confirmation of the grant we anticipate a 1-year timeline for the work to unfold

We recognize that succession planning and its implementation is a multi-phased process. Community building and engagement require time. However we can expect a few clear outcomes on this first very important phase of the process.

The three streams of this work: Asset Mapping, Engagement Plan and Best Practices Report will be tangible outcomes of this work ready to guide the planning of our social infrastructure for the next 5 years.

The energy, innovation and uptake of the information in these reports by membership will be qualified in the community asset seed funding projects. We will know that membership has started on the path toward taking ownership of building our social infrastructure when their ideas for action are vocalized and collaboratively put into action.

We currently have 60% of membership serving in volunteer roles, some with more responsibilities than others. Our attendance at general meetings averages about 40% of our households. We will know that this project is working when we see broad participation in the process we are proposing and increase to these numbers.

This project will act as confirmation that our governance structure is fit for purpose. We will have a clear 5-year plan for what engagement and participation means to us at Sunnyhill and what good housing means for our membership.

Our insight and learnings as a community will become formalized through the sharing in our Webinar.

Outputs

We will track the number of members who participate in the Terms of Reference and scoping process along with the data collection methods. Throughout the year we will also continue to track attendance at regular meetings and volunteer numbers of various committees. The workshops and engagement processes utilized to share the data back will also be tracked, as well as the number of pitches for the Community Asset Seed Funding projects.

Section F: Sustainability

Immediately, we will have a clear course of action for how to proceed with our community building initiatives holistically. We will also have a clearer understanding of what the needs, liabilities and untapped resources are within the community, information right now that is unknown to us. By creating more opportunities for participation through the Community Asset Seed projects, along with the integration of engagement projects across all areas of governance, we anticipate we will see more participation in all areas of the community and governance. By encouraging our community to intentionally begin thinking about our social infrastructure and its significance, we anticipate we will see a renewed sense of community. These conversations and the inquiry process will give memberships an invitation to renew their sense of pride in cooperative living and the ethics of equality and democracy inherent to it.

The long-term goal of this project is succession planning. We want to see less turnover in our community. By creating sustained engagement and participation in all areas of our governance and operations, we can achieve this goal. We want Sunnyhill to be a place where all members feel safe, connected and see a future for themselves with longevity and meaning. Sunnyhill has already shown itself to be a stable long-term home for some members, but the more stability and engagement we see across membership year to year, the more we will know that we have made this shift.

Presentation: An Introduction to MODA

Submitted by Eric on behalf of Planning and Development

Planning and Development is inviting members to:

AN INTRODUCTION TO MODA

June 18th, 7:00 pm - 7:30 pm
Zoom (link: https://bit.ly/2AeyZVJ)

Modern Office of Design + Architecture (MODA) is the Calgary-based architecture and interior design firm that Urban Matters is working with to envision what our aging-in-place, accessible housing might look like. MODA is the same firm that did the design work for our 2 and 3 bedroom in the fall. They offer a collaborative, team-oriented approach to all projects, big or small. MODA’s work ranges from single family residences to institutional projects such as libraries, schools, art galleries and fire halls to multifamily and mid-scale office, retail and commercial buildings.

MODA will provide an introduction to the memberships about how they work and the process they will lead the membership through as we work to design a new building. 

MODA website: http://moda.ca/ 

Email if you need the phone number to join the meeting.
Sunnyhill.planning.development@gmail.com 

Looking forward to seeing you all there!

P and D

Our Mortgage with First Calgary...

Submitted by Eric and Phil on behalf of Planning and Development Committee

Planning and Development would like to revits our mortgage now that we are nearly two years into a five year term. Here is a quick recap: 

Exit our original “high interest” mortgage with CMHC – enter a more favourable arrangement with First Calgary Financial

With support of CMHC’s refinancing program, Sunnyhill was able to exit its 10% CMHC mortgage in June of 2018 without a pre-payment penalty. As such we moved the remainder of our original mortgage over to First Calgary who SACHA had worked with to secure preferred financing for housing co-operatives.

The terms of our mortgage are as follows: $1,802,000.00 at 4.15% for a five-year term, amortized over 20 years. The mortgage we have with First Calgary was approved by membership, vetted by our lawyer, and is saving us $65,000 every year in interest payments compared to the previous CMHC mortgage. Under normal circumstances Sunnyhill would renegotiate a new interest rate at the end of the five year term.

Three conditions to keep in mind

At the time of negotiating the mortgage Mark Terrell was unofficially told by First Calgary that for Sunnyhill to receive a better interest rate in the future, Sunnyhill would need to make improvements to our infrastructure. The other options are to supply the necessary documentation indicating that we have a financial plan AND/OR are in the process of hiring contractors to do this work.

These improvements are items that were identified in the Building Condition Assessment that Planning and Development commissioned in 2018. The improvements include:

  • Balconies - inspected and proven to be safe or replaced according to new codes

  • Windows - replaced as the windows we have are now considered unsafe

  • Roof - that means plans to replace the roof as per a maintenance schedule as indicated in BCA or asset management plan

What to make of these conditions

These items were mentioned by the bank anecdotally, because they are a liability. If these items were to fail, Sunnyhill could potentially be sued, the co-op could go bankrupt, and the bank would therefore not receive a return on their investment. That is why our current interest rate might seem slightly higher than other five-year mortgages. We are being penalized because of the condition of our buildings.

Correcting a misunderstanding

Sunnyhill will qualify for a future mortgage with First Calgary regardless of whether or not it meets the conditions related to the balconies, windows and roof. That is to say, if the above-mentioned work is not considered or completed then we may still obtain financing but it will be at a higher interest rate. This corrects a  misunderstanding in play that Sunnyhill would not qualify for a subsequent mortgage and that, worse, we would be on the hook to repay the remaining balance in 2023.

What the financing pathway looks like from this point forward

Planning and Development undertook a conservative 60-year analysis with Communitas on a rehabilitation-only scenario.

In the analysis we looked at two different lending scenarios (meaning no grants). In both scenarios the rehabilitation of our buildings cost approximately $8,200,000- $10,000,000. In the analysis, the cost of rehabilitation was within range of what we can afford as a membership with no other external support.

Now, compare this to the recent studies that Urban Matters has completed and you will note that their rehabilitation scenario has planned for approximately $100,000 per unit. Putting the early estimate for rehabilitation at $6,600,000. (Bear in mind, this estimate does not factor the cost of a new low rise).

What this tells us is that, with a mortgage-only scenario Sunnyhill should be in a position to rehabilitate our buildings either through a straight-ahead bank mortgage (say with First Calgary) or through one of CHMC’s different financing programs.

Factors to consider at this point at this point

It is critical that we take First Calgary’s liability assessment of Sunnyhill’s infrastructure seriously. We must be in a position come 2023 where Sunnyhill has completed the rehabilitation of our buildings, or at the very least, has a documented plan.

As it happens, the work that Planning and Development is doing with Urban Matter’s effectively addresses the matters of concern.  We are currently working on Phase 2 of a planning process with Urban Matters that will see us develop a fully costed plan.

There is every indication that this costed plan would satisfy First Calgary should we choose to work with them in the future. Our expectation is that with this plan along with the extended lease or land purchase that we anticipate from the City, we will be in position to “shop” around for the best financing options. And from our current vantage point it seems there will be options that range from (best to worst): CMHC’s grant/lending programs under the National Housing Strategy, a third-party lender (New Market Funds or Housing Investment Corporation, for example), or a bank/credit union.

Questions? Concerns?

Please get in touch directly with us, pose a question/comment in the newsletter, or share your concern at the next membership meeting.  It is important that we continually scrutinize the steps we are taking on our financing to make sure we are being prudent and strategic.

Lease Discussion Update

Submitted by Eric on behalf of Planning and Development

Planning and Development received and email from Janet Maccubbin from the City of Calgary (Senior Sales Agent – Affordable Housing | Real Estate and Development Services). Janet has asked us to formally request to purchase the land according to Article 19 of our lease agreement. This will be done via a letter from the Board that Planning and Development is currently drafting.

As many of you know the lease says that we have the option to purchase the land at “fair market value,” which is different than the “book value” discussions we have been having. Janet confirmed that we are still discussing book value of $4.5 - $5.5 million (unfortunately Janet didn’t have the exact information at her finger tips, because she was working from home). However, this is the first time that we have heard a price from the City and it is very much what we have had in mind. Let’s hope it is on the lower end!

As a point of reference: the million dollars that we could have paid for the land in 1978 is now, in today’s dollars, valued at approximately $3.9 million. Meaning, we are clearly paying $1+ million more now than if we had purchased the land 42 years ago, but all the more reason to secure a sale now and not later in time.

Planning and Development Budget Update

Submitted by Eric on behalf of Planning and Development

Planning and Development has identified some miscalculations in our section of the budget that was sent to members earlier this month. Eric and Finance Committee Chair, Jane, met on March 8th to discuss the budget. Below is what discussed:

  1. The budget has $178,000 allocated for Planning and Development

  2. This amount is largely dedicated to work the membership approved at our June 2019 general meeting

  3. Of the $178,000 budgeted, $138,000 of this is actually money that was provided in addition to the refinancing we received 2 summers ago. This means that the membership is being asked to raise an additional $138,000 through housing charges, but the money already exists as part of the mortgage.

  4. Planning and Development received notice of our $25,000 grant from CMHC last September. We have until this September to complete the work and submit our final report (waiting to finish energy audit and produce a pro forma). This means Planning and Development will be generating $25,000 in revenue this year, but membership is also being asked to raise this money through housing charges.

  5. In addition to above, Planning and Development has reduced our operating expenses by $14,7000 for 2020. We are able to do this because we have a clearer picture of the work that will be undertaken this year. We have submitted this change to Finance.

Put together: $138,000 existing mortgage + $25,000 CMHC grant + $14,700 reduction in operation expenses, means that Planning and Development has identified $177,000 that doesn’t need to be covered by the membership via housing charges.

Planning and Development isn’t advocating a change to the budget increases proposed by Finance. That is not our purpose here. Instead, with these corrections the membership will be able to have a clearer discussion about the budget.

Thank you to the Finance Committee for their hard work and collaborative spirit! Always a pleasure working with you folks.

Planning and Development Update - March 2020

Submitted by Eric Moschopedis on behalf of Planning and Development

It has been a couple of months since Planning and Development has written to the membership, but the membership has been very active in learning about our progress and has made some important decisions in this time.

On December 16th, Lee Provost from Urban Matters attended an open Planning and Development meeting where he presented to the membership a summery of the work completed and made recommendations (slideshow here) as to how Sunnyhill could acheive accessiblity (aging in place), negotiate with City of Calgary regarding our land lease, and rehabilitate our buildings. Urban Matters used five Guiding Principles to inform their recommendations:

  • Strong membership support for aging-in-place opportunities,

  • Strong commitment to energy efficiency/sustainability upgrades,

  • Successful land lease/purchase from the City of Calgary,

  • Ability to satisfy funding (CMHC) opportunities, and

  • Impact to operating pro-forma, debt-servicing ability and rents.

Urban Matters considered two different approaches for Sunnyhill. One: building envelope upgrades with some visitablity updates for accessibility, and two: building envelope upgrades with new age-in-place units. In their report, Urban Matters says:

Weighing the benefits and challenges of both options, and recognizing the significant risks of proceeding with any development undertaking, our recommendation is that Option 2 presents as most able to satisfy the membership’s desire for age-in-place options while meeting the same energy efficiency/sustainability options as would be achieved with Option 1. It would also better support a lease extension or purchase from the City of Calgary, the latter of which could help secure a permanent future for Sunnyhill in its established, supported location. Option 2 also has the much better chance of meeting the CMHC’s accessibility requirements and thereby contributing to a competitive funding application because it addresses the accessibility requirement. And lastly, Option 2 provides more options to find partnership capital contributions and operating proforma supports.

At the January 27, 2020 General Meeting, Planning and Development asked the membership to:

approve Urban Matters recommendations and that Planning and Development continue working towards an “environmentally and economically sustainable” “deep green retrofit” as the standard for rehabilitation of our housing stock and the development of evidence-based scenarios for “aging in place” at SHC with an eye towards accessibility as defined by CHMC’s Co-investment Fund until proven unviable or until October 2021.

The motion passed.

At the same meeting we brought forward four other motions. The first was to agree to “a set of principles to guide Sunnyhill’s decision-making related to those members presently living in units that would mostly likely be affected by any decision to redevelop.” The motion passed.

We also asked the membership to approve an “evidence-based succession planning process that may include, but is not limited to, a robust membership engagement process, collecting statistical information, membership surveys, proposed changes, updates or additions to policy, and recommendations for the role, quantification, and definition of participation at SHC.” This motion was prompted by the Asset Management Plan that was created by Urban Matters and Planning and Development. The plan identified succession planning as a medium strategic risk to the services SHC provides and how we provide them. We will be bringing a plan forward to the membership in the next while. Stay tuned.

The last two motions were for small expenditures to study the pilings our buildings are standing on and to do an energy audit. These motions also passed.

Lastly, we want to report that we have been busy and in conversation with Urban Matters and CMHC about next steps. Urban Matters is currently working on a Phase 2 proposal and will be presenting it to the committee in the coming weeks. CMHC has had a turn over in staff, but we moved quickly to establish a new relationship with the new regional program officer. We will report back on all of this as soon as there is information.

Thanks for reading all of this!

One Bedroom Engagement

Submitted by Herta

The members from the four one bedroom units met with the P&D Committee to discuss their concerns and options available should they have to move out of their homes while construction is undertaken. The discussion was informative for all concerned and resulted in a draft proposal to be brought forward to the Board and the membership. Meanwhile every effort is being made to keep the four one bedroom members informed on every step that is being considered concerning the Retrofit as it impacts them.

Lease Update

Submitted by Herta and Eric

While all seemed quiet on the surface for Planning and Development, lots of important things were happening in the background thanks to Lee Prevost’s efforts on behalf of our co-op.

Lee met with the City’s Real Estate & Development (REDS) business unit and discussed two options regarding our lease. OPTION 1 focused on re-skinning the building envelope and improving the visitability of some of the units through accessibility improvements (for instance, door hardware, potentially better access to the office, and some limited grounds/landscaping changes). OPTION 2 proposes to proceed with the re-skinning of the building envelope and add an additional 16 fully accessible age-in-place units. These new units would likely go in the area currently occupied by the one-bedroom units.

Lee reported that City likes the two options and are gravitating toward two very different scenarios:

  • a 40 year lease extension in support of OPTION 1 - regeneration-only

  • a sale at book value in support of OPTION 2 that includes development of new units

In conclusion Urban Matters is leaning towards recommending OPTION 2. While significantly more complex, OPTION 2 addresses one of the membership’s key concern about the ability to age-in-place; is a much stronger narrative at a time when there is a lot of competition for funding; and it also seems like the option most compelling to the City in support of a sale at book value.

Lee will be presenting a full report to the membership mid-December.

Member Login
Welcome, (First Name)!

Forgot? Show
Log In
Enter Member Area
My Profile Not a member? Sign up. Log Out